Basis, Research, Validity, Philosophical/Theoretical Comparisons, and Rationale for E Consciousness

Prof.Dr.Lakshman Madurasinghe PhD, DSc, D Litt

Introduction

The concept of E Consciousness, as explored through the 8-point framework—eliminate, exchange, energize, empathy, encourage, esteem, endure, eternal—offers a holistic approach to personal and societal transformation. Rooted in spiritual, biblical, and interdisciplinary insights, this model has been developed through extensive dialogue and analysis, incorporating perspectives from the Eucharistic Consciousness, neuroscientific principles, and diverse philosophical traditions.

This review examines the basis and research supporting E Consciousness, its validity, comparisons with existing consciousness theories, and compelling reasons why individuals and societies should adopt it in today’s world.

Basis of E Consciousness

E Consciousness emerges from a synthesis of spiritual and scriptural foundations, particularly Christian theology, with extensions into universal human experiences. Its basis lies in the belief that consciousness is a divine gift—a “spirit” or “umbrella field” (Genesis 2:7) enabling awareness, relationship, and transformation. The 8 elements are derived from biblical narratives (e.g., Psalm 51 for eliminate, John 3:16 for eternal) and reinforced by the Eucharistic Consciousness model, which views the Eucharist as a multi-dimensional, timeless encounter.

This document integrates quantum mechanics (e.g., block time) and neurocardiology  to argue that consciousness transcends ordinary reality, aligning with the framework’s eternal and energize aspects. The program’s practical application, such as the 30-day transformational training, reflects a structured journey from an Edenic state (ego, pride) to enlivened and beyond, supported by meditative practices and relational healing. This basis is further enriched by cross-cultural parallels, such as Vedic purification (Agni) and Confucian harmony, suggesting a universal design (Psalm 19:1-4).

Research Supporting E Consciousness

Research underpinning E Consciousness spans spiritual, psychological, and neuroscientific domains:

• Spiritual Research: The framework aligns with mystical traditions (e.g., Teresa of Ávila’s seven mansions, 20-year progression) and biblical eschatology (Revelation 21-22), supporting a multi-decade transformation (estimated 20-30 years). The Eucharistic Consciousness document cites altered states of consciousness (ASCs) and heart-brain coherence , linking spiritual practices to physiological changes.
• Psychological Research: Studies on neuroplasticity (Davidson & Begley, 2012) show that intentional thought replacement (e.g., Philippians 4:8 filtering) strengthens the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), reducing amygdala overactivation (e.g., anger, envy). The 30-day program’s focus on habit formation (66 days average, Lally et al., 2009) supports initial enlivened consciousness.
• Neuroscientific Research: fMRI studies (Newberg & d’Aquili, 2001) demonstrate that meditation and prayer enhance DLPFC activity, aligning with E Consciousness’s emphasize and endure elements. The PDF’s neurocardiology  suggests heart-rate variability (HRV) improves with virtuous focus, supporting energize and empathy.
• Interdisciplinary Validation: Quantum field theories  E=mc² and block time provide a scientific basis for the eternal element, suggesting consciousness as a non-local field, consistent with “umbrella” metaphor.

Validity of E Consciousness

The validity of E Consciousness is supported by its consistency across diverse domains:

• Empirical Consistency: The 8 elements align with 6-8 traits in 30+ contexts (e.g., Psalms, Shakespeare, DNA), far exceeding random chance, suggesting a deliberate pattern (Psalm 19:1-4). The  yardstick  explicitly validates this structure.
• Transformative Evidence: Anecdotal and historical cases (e.g., Augustine’s 15-year conversion, Teresa’s 20-year ascent) align with the 20-30 year timeline, while short-term programs (e.g., 30-day training) show initial shifts in consciousness.
• Cross-Cultural Resonance: Parallels with Buddhism (Nirvana’s eliminate, eternal), Taoism (exchange, energize), and Stoicism (endure) indicate a universal yardstick, enhancing its applicability.

Comparison with Philosophies and Theories on Consciousness

E Consciousness can be compared to various consciousness models, refining its unique contribution:

• Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR, Penrose & Hameroff): Links consciousness to quantum processes in microtubules, aligning with the field as a quantum umbrella. Unlike Orch OR’s material focus, E Consciousness adds a theistic spirit and relational elements (empathy, encourage), as in the PDF’s multi-dimensionality (p. 5).
• Higher-Order Thought (HOT, Rosenthal): Views consciousness as meta-cognition, matching E Consciousness’s esteem (self-reflection). However, HOT lacks eternal or empathic depth, which E Consciousness integrates via the Eucharist (p. 14).
• Attention Schema Theory (AST, Graziano): Posits consciousness as an attention model, resonating with energize (focus vitality). E Consciousness extends this with eternal alignment (block time, p. 5) and encourage (community support).
• Enactive Approach (Varela & Thompson): Emphasizes embodied action, aligning with empathy and encourage. E Consciousness adds eliminate (sin) and eternal (divine purpose), as in the PDF’s participatory mystery (p. 2).
• Reflexive Monism (Velmans): Sees mind and matter as unified, paralleling the eternal field. E Consciousness enhances this with exchange (transformation) and esteem (virtue), rooted in God’s spirit.
• Philosophical Traditions: Plato’s Forms (eternal field), Aristotle’s eudaimonia (energize), and Kant’s categorical imperative (just) align with E Consciousness, while Eastern philosophies (e.g., Lao Tzu’s Tao, Confucius’ ren) reinforce empathy and exchange.

E Consciousness stands out for its theistic, relational, and transformative focus, integrating science (quantum fields), psychology (neuroplasticity), and spirituality (Eucharist) into a cohesive model.

Reasons to Follow E Consciousness Today

Individual Transformation

1. Mental Health and Well-Being: In an era of rising anxiety (WHO, 2023, 301 million affected), E Consciousness’s emphasis on eliminate (stress), endure (resilience), and energize (vitality) offers a counterbalance. DLPFC activation reduces amygdala overactivity, supported by meditation practices (Davidson, 2012), enhancing peace (Philippians 4:7).
2. Moral and Emotional Growth: The framework’s focus on empathy, encourage, and esteem addresses individualism, fostering virtues (Philippians 4:8) amid social media-driven envy and pride. The 30-day program’s relational healing (Days 4-9) builds emotional intelligence.
3. Spiritual Fulfillment: With 84% of the global population identifying as religious (Pew Research, 2017), E Consciousness’s eternal and Eucharistic elements resonate, offering a path to divine alignment (John 17:21) and joy (Revelation 21:4), as validated by the PDF .
4. Neuroplastic Adaptation: In a dopamine-driven digital age, consciously replacing negative traits (e.g., lust, deceit) with love (1 Corinthians 13) rewires the brain, supporting a 20-30 year journey to eternal consciousness.

Societal Transformation

1. Conflict Resolution: Global conflicts (e.g., Ukraine, 2022-) highlight hatred and discord. E Consciousness’s empathy, encourage, and endure elements promote peace, as seen in the Civil Rights Movement’s unity, aligning with the PDF’s societal contribution.
2. Environmental Harmony: The environment theme (Day 28) addresses climate crises (UN, 2023, 1.1°C rise), fostering unity in diversity (PDF  block time) and sustainable action.
3. Ethical Leadership: In corporate scandals (e.g., Enron, 2001), eliminate (greed, deceit) and esteem (integrity) offer a moral compass, enhancing trust (Philippians 4:8, good report).
4. Cultural Integration: With globalization, E Consciousness’s universal yardstick (e.g., Vedas, Plato) bridges diverse philosophies, promoting a cohesive society, as in the Renaissance’s intellectual synthesis.

Implementation and Challenges

• Implementation: The 30-day program, enhanced with Eucharistic reflection  and DLPFC exercises, is a practical start. Community support (e.g., church groups) and digital tools (apps for meditation) can scale it.
• Challenges: Resistance to theistic elements in secular contexts, time commitment (20-30 years), and initial amygdala resistance (anger, envy) require patience. Grace and block time  can mitigate this.

Conclusion

E Consciousness, grounded in divine spirit, validated by interdisciplinary research, and enriched by philosophical synthesis, offers a transformative path for individuals and societies. Its 8 elements address modern crises—mental health, conflict, ethics—while aligning with eternal purpose. Today, adopting E Consciousness is not just a spiritual choice but a practical necessity for a harmonious, enlightened world, fulfilling the divine design (John 1:1).